Revolutionary idea...

I am wondering if it would be considered neglectful if I suddenly just stopped feeding my children? Would it be child endangerment? Or maybe it would just be considered inappropriate? I've been called inappropriate before...I could live with that. I have come to the conclusion that it is an exercise in futility to feed my children every day. It is an unnecessary burden on my time, my checkbook, and my mental health. A sane, rational person would not continue feeding a creature that will not eat. It is completely nonsensical to feed my kids. Every night I spend invaluable mental energy contemplating what to cook for dinner and precious time cooking it, only to have it thrown in the trash. And it does not matter what I cook. Asparagus? Trash. Sandwiches? Trash. Mac & cheese? Trash. Pancakes? Trash. It doesn't matter if it is a food they like or not....though I could count the number of foods they "like" on one hand. They simply do not eat. What do you do with children who do not eat? I feel an obligation to offer them food, regardless. But I am wondering if perhaps cutting them off completely would make more sense? Imagine if I never fed them...would they have the energy to run around like lunatics? No more jumping on the beds. I might actually be able to catch them when they run. They wouldn't have the fortitude to riot. Hmmm...I like this idea. It could even be considered "green" living, don't you think? No more wasting food...no more wasting packaging. No more tossing away the blood and sweat of the American farmer. I think this is a revolutionary idea. I could start a movement. My very own version of Farm Aid. Save the American Farmer...stop feeding your ungrateful children.